Cases 11 - 20 of 2,911
Flores v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02238
Plaintiff:
Pablo G. Flores
Defendant:
Edward J. Borla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Flores v. The People
as 1:2024cv00444
Petitioner:
Joaquin Flores
Respondent:
The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WAYNE ROBERTSON
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, GARDENER, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasso v. Flores et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jasso
Defendant:
Flores, Unknown 1, Unknown 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Escamilla v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), State of California, CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miguel Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez-Flores v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez-Flores
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correcional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
