Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Graciela Fernandez Flores
Defendant:
San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc and Franciso Javier Romo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Washington v. Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05165
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Washington, Miles Matthews, Jimmy Beck and others
Defendant:
Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Flores v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Andy Flores
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flores v. Jhonson et al
as 4:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Adam Flores
Defendant:
Tish Jhonson, Stan McGahee and Does 1-2, "Sgt. Christy" and "Deputy Chris"
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Yates
as 2:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Andy Flores
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. Van Buren County Jail
as 4:2020cv00207
Defendant:
Van Buren County Jail, Lucas Emberton, Randy Churches and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Colin Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Traders Insurance Company v. Flores-Perez et al
as 5:2018cv05227
Defendant:
Washington Regional Medical Center, Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Medical Services, Third Party Liability, Orthopedic & Trauma Service of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Traders Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 5:2018cv05086
Plaintiff:
Adam Brooks Flores
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical, Trinity Food Service, Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. County of Benton, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05063
Plaintiff:
Adrian Michael Flores
Defendant:
County of Benton, Arkansas, Shawn Holloway, James Chamberlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila-Flores v. USA
as 5:2016cv05267
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Avila-Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
