Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Belcastro Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Katherine Belcastro Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Omaha and Todd Schmaderer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
David Gonzalez-Garcia
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Gonzalez Martinez v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2020cv00372
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Juan Gonzalez Martinez
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Belcastro-Gonzalez v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2019cv00572
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Jean Stothert, Tim Young and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine Belcastro-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martinez v. Lancaster Department of Corrections
as 8:2019cv00268
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Gonzalez Martinez
Respondent:
Lancaster Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martinez v. Johnson
as 8:2019cv00148
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Gonzalez Martinez
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Brad Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. USA
as 8:2018cv00167
Petitioner:
Jesus Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez-Lemus v. USA
as 4:2016cv03135
Petitioner:
Ernestina Gonzalez-Lemus
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
