Cases 41 - 50 of 30,556
King v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Kevin King
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hawn v. Clallam County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05310
Plaintiff:
Daniel WJ Hawn
Defendant:
Clallam County Jail, Brian King, Clallam County Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. USA - 2255
as 1:2024cv01228
Petitioner:
Jordale King
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hinson v. J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hinson
Defendant:
J.C.C.F. Medical Department Corr Healths, Dr. FNU Wozniack, Kim King, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gibson v. Grant
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
DONALD GIBSON
Defendant:
Police Officer TERIQ C. GRANT, Shield No. 12175, Detective RYAN OLSEN, Shield #5992 and JOHN DOE, Kings County District Attorney (ADA)
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
