Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RALPH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03088
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L RALPH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ralph v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2019cv00214
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sherri L Ralph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
YOUNG v. RALPH et al
as 4:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MAURICE YOUNG
Defendant:
A L RALPH, C E LAGO, L J OZUNA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. The Bank of Hampton Roads et al
as 2:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jack W. Gibson
Defendant:
The Bank of Hampton Roads, The Bank of Hampton Roads Supplemental Retirement Plan, Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Nathaniel Richardson v. William Suter, et al
as 10-5129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathaniel J. Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk of Court, Sued in his Individual Capacities, S. Elliott, Case Analyst, Sued in his Individual Capacities, Sandy Spagnolo, Case Analyst, Sued in her Individual Capacities and others
RICHARDSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2010cv00577
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J. RICHARDSON, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, S. ELLIOTT, SANDY SPAGNOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph v. United States of America
as 8:2007cv00717
Plaintiff:
James L. Ralph
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
MONSANTO CO V RALPH
as 04-1304
Defendant-Appellant:
KEM L. RALPH and KEM L. RALPH (dba Ralph Brothers Farms)
Plaintiff-Appellee:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
