Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Braun v. Maslankowski et al
as 0:2023cv01784
Petitioner:
Nathan Christopher Braun
Respondent:
Cpt. Maslankowski, Steve Soyka, Lt Boerger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lahr et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv03371
Plaintiff:
Don Lahr and Cynthia Lahr
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. William Jackson
as 19-3630
Defendant:
Pamela Maness, Jerry Lahr, as Trustee for Trinity Consulting, Rock Foundation; Gateway Properties, and Prosperity Leasing, Sharon Jackson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
William Phillip Jackson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Van Ballegooyen v. State Treatment and Rehabilitation Academy et al
as 4:2018cv04171
Plaintiff:
Dawn Van Ballegooyen
Defendant:
Dennis Daugarrd, Michael Mieczkowski, Brent R. Phillips and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Brady Folkens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lahr v. Vojacek et al
as 0:2018cv03113
Plaintiff:
Richard Roman Lahr
Defendant:
Cody Vojacek and Andrew Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Ballegooyen v. Dauguaard et al
as 4:2018cv04051
Plaintiff:
Dawn Van Ballegooyen
Defendant:
Dennis Dauguaard , Denny Kaemingk , Daniel Mart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery et al v. Lahr Agency, LLC
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Avery and Denise M. Avery
Defendant:
Lahr Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. City of Des Peres et al
as 4:2017cv02771
Plaintiff:
Perry Newman
Defendant:
City of Des Peres , Des Peres Department of Public Safety , Rick Lahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lahr v. Vojacek
as 0:2017cv01349
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Lahr
Defendant:
Cody Vojacek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Jackson et al
as 3:2016cv05096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William Phillip Jackson, Sharon Jackson, Edward McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
