Cases 1 - 8 of 8
1 Energy Solutions, Inc. et al v. Nicolas Holiday, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03230
Plaintiff:
1 Energy Solutions, Inc. and LEDUP Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicolas Holiday, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Movant:
Nexsen Pruet LLC and Michael A Mann
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Neurowave Medical Technologies, LLC v. Mann (TV2)
as 3:2013cv00487
Plaintiff:
Neurowave Medical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Mann
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Neurowave Medical Technologies LLC v. Comfort Quest, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv04683
Plaintiff:
Neurowave Medical Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Comfort Quest, Inc, Thomas Mann and Joseph Norris
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Stephen Mann v. Waterplay Solutions Corp et al
as 1:2011cv00268
Defendant:
Lincoln Equipment, Inc. and Waterplay Solutions Corp
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mann
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mentor Group, L.L.C. v. Mann et al
as 6:2009cv00872
Plaintiff:
Mentor Group, L.L.C. and Mentor Group, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Phillip E. Mann and Jan Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research v. Cochlear Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv08108
Defendant:
Cochlear Corporation and Cochlear Ltd
Plaintiff:
Advanced Bionics, LLC and Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research
Special Master:
Gale Peterson
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Apio, Inc. v. Mann Packing Company, Inc.
as 5:2007cv05628
Plaintiff:
Apio, Inc. and Apio, Inc.
Defendant:
Mann Packing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Donaldson Company, Inc. v. Mann+Hummel USA, Inc et al
as 0:2007cv04136
Plaintiff:
Donaldson Company, Inc., Donaldson Company, Inc., Donaldson Company, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mann+Hummel USA, Inc and Mann+Hummel GmbH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
