Cases 21 - 30 of 261
Harpe v. Lawler et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A Harpe
Defendant:
Tom Lawler, Wendy Mann and Richard T Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GREEN v. MANN et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
TRESCA GREEN
Defendant:
ARTHUR MANN, SAMUEL CORALUZZO CO INC doing business as S CORALUZZO CO INC, PENCO LEASING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Harpe v. Lawler et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel A. Harpe
Defendant:
Tom Lawler, Richard T. Alexander and Wendy Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann et al v. Emergent Technologies Group, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2021cv04559
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mann, Mackenzy Hamby, Nathaniel Hamby and others
Defendant:
Emergent Technologies Group, L.L.C. and Ronald Pearcey
GLENN v. LOCKETTE et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
VERNON MELVIN GLENN, JR
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIE LOCKETTE, JUSTIN MANN, JERAL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Littler Mendelson, P.C. v. Polsinelli P.C.
as 1:2021cv03855
Plaintiff:
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Defendant:
Melissa Mann and Polsinelli P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mann v. Adams et al
as 6:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Aramis Mann
Defendant:
Brian Adams, Mr. McFarland, Mrs. Epperson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOOS v. MANN
as 5:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS H LOOS, SR
Defendant:
MARK W MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
