Cases 41 - 50 of 1,839
Miles, Jr. v. Hinesley et al
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Dr. Roger Lee Miles, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Harold A. Hinesley and Senior Judge Robert W. Adamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Goodman et al
as 3:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
Donald Miles
Defendant:
. Goodman, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Richard Stempinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP et al
as 4:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant:
CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. DAVIS et al
as 4:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
CHRISTI DAVIS, HEATH DAVIS, ADAM ELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacDonald v. York County Sheriff, et al
as 23-2055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
YORK COUNTY SHERIFF, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAIL ADMINISTRATOR and others
Miles v. Goodman et al
as 3:2023cv03940
Plaintiff:
Donald Miles
Defendant:
Goodman, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Richard Stempinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. POLISKNOWSKI et al
as 4:2023cv00524
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MILES
Respondent:
JOHN POLISKNOWSKI, SHEVAUN HARRIS and FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILES v. SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD MILES
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA JAIL, MEDSTREET MEDICAL and LEGACY BEHAVIORAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Miles et al
as 1:2023cv16342
Petitioner:
Khalid Norwood
Respondent:
Sherwin Miles, . Terry, . Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
