Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
Noel et al v. Cronan et al
as 1:2023cv12299
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel, Arnold G Noel, Jr., Bartley M. Noel and others
Defendant:
Paul M Cronan, Barthine Romelus, Brailey Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Noel v. Hartzell et al
as 1:2023cv10716
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Neil Hartzell, Kathleen A Reagan and Mark Coven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Noel v. Orfanello et al
as 1:2022cv11494
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Judge Mary A. Orfanello and Kathleen A Reagan, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Noel v. Hawaiian Telecom et al
as 1:2022cv11423
Plaintiff:
Arnold A Noel
Defendant:
Hawaiian Telecom, Eric K Yeaman, Steven Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Emery et al v. CVR9395 LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tina Emery and David Emery
Defendant:
CVR9395 LLC and James Reagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reagan et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00190
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ralph Reagan and Connie Reagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Boston Rickshaw LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10530
Plaintiff:
Atain Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Boston Rickshaw LLC, Dennis Suozzi, Laura Gentry Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corrado v. Southcoast Emergency Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Defendant:
Southcoast Emergency Medical Services Inc. and Frank O'Reagan
Plaintiff:
Crystal Corrado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
