Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Sassman v. State of Iowa
as 4:2022cv00444
Petitioner:
Jason Robert Sassman
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DORSEY v. BURNS et al
as 1:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. DORSEY
Defendant:
MS. BURNS, MR. ADEOLINE, DAVID ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Sassman v. US Dept. of State National Passport Center and its Chief Officer et al
as 2:2020cv01803
Plaintiff:
William Sassman
Defendant:
Agency General Counsel, Del Norte County Office of Child Support Enforcement and US Department of State National Passport Center and its Chief Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sassman v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01110
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Leah Sassman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PS) Sassman v. Department of Child Support Services et al
as 2:2019cv00443
Defendant:
County of Child Support Agency, I. Fischer, Margaret B. Walton and others
Plaintiff:
William Arthur Sassman, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sassman v. Brown et al
as 2:2014cv01679
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Beard
Plaintiff:
William A. Sassman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sassman v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 7:2014cv04523
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sassman
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
