Cases 11 - 20 of 21,864
Woods v. Digital Insurance LLC
as 2:2024cv14130
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jo Woods
Defendant:
Digital Insurance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Richard Harris v. Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11357
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and W. WOOD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kahoe v. Heemans et al
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Lonnie J. Kahoe, Sr.
Defendant:
Karen Heemans and Justin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massa v. City of Ocala Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Edwin Claudio Massa
Defendant:
City of Ocala Police Department, Marion County Jail, Michael 'Billy' Woods Marion County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff - Individual and Official Capacity doing business as William "Billy" Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03439
Plaintiff:
Edwina A. Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
