Cases 1 - 10 of 691
Braswell et al v. MAT Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marie Kathleen Braswell and Julio Cesar Arredondo
Defendant:
MAT Transport, Inc. and Brenda Lawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arredondo Gavilan v. RCS & Company, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
OSNIEL ARREDONDO GAVILAN
Defendant:
RCS & Company, Inc and Rafael Cata
Arredondo v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Sergio Arredondo
Respondent:
H. Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Pugh v. Arredondo et al
as 5:2024cv01890
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pugh
Defendant:
S. Arredondo, Aceves, N. Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arredondo v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
MARY ARREDONDO
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutrial Industries LP, NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Automation Innovations, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Patrick Allen
Defendant:
Automation Innovations, LLC, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Diego Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arredondo v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01147
Plaintiff:
Mary Arredondo
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LP., Novo Nordisk Research Center Seattle Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarez Arredondo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-617
Petitioner:
YENIFER MARICRUZ ALVAREZ ARREDONDO, ILKER EDUARDO GONZALEZ ALVAREZ and ILDI DAMIAN GONZALEZ ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
