Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Nally v. Carey et al
as 5:2012cv00085
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Allen Nally, Jr.
Respondent:
James T. Carey , Larry Roberts , James Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grady v. Winders et al
as 5:2011ct03257
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Grady
Defendant:
Carey Winders and Fane Greenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
as 11-7482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPHELIA DE'LONTA
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of VDOC, FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services for VDOC, MEREDITH R. CAREY, Chief Psychiatrist for VDOC and others
Carey v. Drago et al
as 2:2011cv02875
Plaintiff:
Billy Carey
Defendant:
Dr Drago, Dr McRee, Nurse Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Brown v. Sydney Lackey
as 11-7269
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
SYDNEY JEROME LACKEY, Vice Narcotics Detective, CHARLIE T. DAVIS, Vice Narcotics Detective, LUKE J. DONAHUE, Vice Narcotic Police and others
Brown v. Lackey et al
as 3:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
William Arthur Brown
Respondent:
Sydney Jerome Lackey, Charlie T. Davis, Luke J. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
as 11-6924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPHELIA DE'LONTA
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director of VDOC, FRED SCHILLING, Director of Health Services for VDOC, MEREDITH R. CAREY, Chief Psychiatrist for VDOC and others
Carey v. Abbasi
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Michael Carey
Defendant:
Abbasi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De'lonta v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00257
Defendant:
Gary L. Bass, Meredith R. Carey, Major C. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ophelia Azriel De'lonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carey v. Oha et al
as 1:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cyril Carey, Sr.
Defendant:
Oha and Gary Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
