Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
COLEMAN v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
WAYDE COLEMAN
Defendant:
JOSH A PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/MARION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. MCNUTT et al
as 1:2021cv02868
Plaintiff:
THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and Pickwick Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
JAMES ROBERT MCNUTT, STANDARD CHANGE-MAKERS, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST, ON BEHALF OF PICKWICK HOLDINGS, INC. and STANDARD CHANGE-MAKERS, INC. LIQUIDATING TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMS v. SCANLON et al
as 2:2021cv00214
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, MARK, CHANG and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Sun & Chang Corporation
as 3:2020cv00256
Plaintiff:
Doris Johnson and Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Sun & Chang Corporation
Bahena v. Sun & Chang Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Kuang N Chang, Sun & Chang Inc and Geo DA Inc
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bahena, Horacio Sanchez and Fortunada Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
MUNCIE SANITARY DISTRICT
Defendant:
JACKSON, JAMIE GREGORY, EK PROPERTIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Chang et al v. Forest River Inc
as 3:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Leesha Chang and Christopher Chang
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
