Cases 21 - 30 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00249
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
SHAWN THOMAS
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOWARD CLARK and UPSTAGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE, LARRY JUNIOR MERIS and RAYMOND SCHOFIELD HYATT
Defendant:
SERGEANT CLARK, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, CAPTAIN SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERIS v. SOUTHERN
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
LARRY MERIS
Defendant:
J.P. SOUTHERN, CUPID, K. CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. FISCHER et al
as 1:2021cv00923
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
J. CLARK FISCHER, FORSYTH COUNTY, JIM O'NELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. MARKELL et al
as 1:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL LAMONT CLARK ALLEN
Defendant:
RYAN MARKELL and DARRELL STILLWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. FLOYD et al
as 1:2021cv00878
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE
Defendant:
JOE FLOYD, LIEUTENANT NELSON, CORPORAL TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. STANLY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 1:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL LAMONT CLARK ALLEN
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and JEFF CRISCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRING v. SCHER et al
as 1:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
TOMMY HERRING
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD L. SCHER, JUDIE B. CLARK, M.D. NALINA BAIJNATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
