Cases 1 - 10 of 200
Vela v. Compton
as 24-40302
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Vela, Sr., Rodolfo Vela, Jr. and Anna Vela
Defendant:
Mike Compton, Sheriff, Tom Stephens, Deputy Sheriff, S. Norie, Deputy Sheriff and others
Graham v. Pippens et al
as 3:2023cv02850
Plaintiff:
Gene Graham
Defendant:
Makisha Pippens, DHA and Laurin Compton
Moore v. McFarling, et al.
as 4:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Henry Moore
Defendant:
Judge FNU McFarling, Dr Kristi Compton, Dr FNU Goodness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Compton v. Lumpkin et al
as 9:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Dillion Compton
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, The TDCJ Director's Review Committe, Ronald Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vela et al v. Compton et al
as 4:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Vela, Sr, Rodolfo Vela, Jr and Anna Vela
Defendant:
Mike Compton, Tom Stephens, S. Norie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vela et al v. Compton et al
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Vela, Sr, Rodolfo Vela, Jr and Anna Vela
Defendant:
Mike Compton, Tom Stephens, S Norie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Compton v. United National Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv04768
Plaintiff:
Wayne Compton
Defendant:
United National Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Compton v. United National Insurance Co
as 1:2022cv04827
Plaintiff:
Wayne Compton
Defendant:
United National Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lee v. Compton et al
as 6:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee and Lee El, Clarence
Respondent:
Sgt. Compton and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Ezra et al
as 5:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lee and Lee El, Clarence
Defendant:
David Alan Ezra and Sgt. Compton and Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
