Cases 1 - 9 of 9
La Bottega Franchise, Inc. et al v. JJB Plainview LLC
as 2:2023cv05338
Plaintiff:
La Bottega Franchise, Inc.
Defendant:
JJB Plainview LLC and Bruno M. DiCarlo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
R. J. Cat II, Inc v. DiCarlos Original Pizza, LLC
as 4:2022cv01587
Plaintiff:
R. J. Cat II, Inc
Defendant:
DiCarlos Original Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Novoluto GmbH v. Uccellini LLC
as 6:2020cv02284
Defendant:
Uccellini LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Lora DiCarlo
Plaintiff:
Novoluto GmbH
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pinder et al v. S. DiCarlo, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Lucy Pinder, Irina Voronina and Carmen Electra
Defendant:
Tess Collins, S. DiCarlo, Inc. and S. DiCarlo, Inc. doing business as DiCarlo's Gentlemen's Club
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dustin Adler v. RelyNet, Inc., et al
as 11-16204
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DUSTIN K. ADLER
Defendant - Appellant:
RELYNET, INC. and MICHAEL DICARLO
Defendant:
INTERMEDIA OUTDOORS and VORTEX MEDIA GROUP, INC.
Pappas et al v. Choi Kwang Do Martial Arts International, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10460
Defendant:
Choi Kwang Do Martial Arts International, Inc. and Kwang Jo Choi
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Pappas , Gary Collins , Jeff D. Bully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HawgLite, L.L.C. v. DiCarlo
as 1:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
HawgLite, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Joseph DiCarlo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adler v. Relynet, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2008cv01333
Plaintiff:
Dustin K. Adler
Defendant:
Relynet, Inc. and Michael DiCarlo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The American Board of Pediatrics v. DiCarlo
as 2:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
The American Board of Pediatrics, The American Board of Pediatrics, The American Board of Pediatrics and others
Defendant:
Salvatore DiCarlo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
