Cases 21 - 30 of 3,910
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Gordon et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Joshua E. Davis
Defendant:
Jameis Gordon, Benard Robinson and John and Jane Does Officers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 4:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frickey v. Bickham
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ryk Anthony Frickey
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Perez v. Guerra
as 24-40128
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia-Perez
Defendant:
J. E. "Eddie" Guerra, Sheriff, Jose R. Vasquez, Captain, David Flores, First Lieutenant and others
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles and Warden Callendar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Hancoch and Anthony E Hancock
Defendant:
Jane Doe, FNU Kinnedy, Vannesa LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. E-Comms et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
E-Comms and Candice Teer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
