Cases 31 - 40 of 6,113
Hyden-Subichin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Joan E. Hyden-Subichin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ulatowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Sara E. Ulatowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grandits v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Grandits
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STEPHENSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. STEPHENSON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Kathleen E. Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
King v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Paul E. King
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Parrott v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Parrott
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Erin E. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hickman v. Preston et al
as 3:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jabar Hickman
Defendant:
Kathryn Preston, Wanda C. E. Beanmon and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Farrah E. Hughes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
