Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Chen v. Samantha et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Ena Chen
Defendant:
Samantha, Vivian, Ana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Enas Said v. USA
as 23-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENAS N.A. SAID, doing business as SCF Market, doing business as Steak City Fish and Chicken; doing business as Mini Food Market,
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Fitzmorris, et al v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv02772
Plaintiff:
Patrick Fitzmorris and Ena Fitzmorris
Defendant:
QBE Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marquez Martinez v. Garland
as 22-6117
Petitioner:
ENA MARITZA MARQUEZ MARTINEZ, FRANKLIN JAVIER MEDINA MARQUEZ and DANIEL ALEXANDER ROMERO MARQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reckitt Benckiser (ENA) BV v. Tufco LP
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Reckitt Benckiser (ENA) BV
Defendant:
Tufco LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Grayes et al v. Fisher et al
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ena Grayes and Otto Grayes
Defendant:
Prosecutor Fisher, City of Cleveland Prosecutor's Office, Secretary Barbara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grayes et al v. Santiago
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ena Grayes and Otto Grayes
Defendant:
Detective Giovanni Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Grayes et al v. Sheppard et al
as 1:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ena Grayes and Otto Grayes
Defendant:
Dan Sheppard, Vanguard Properties, Does I - X and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
