Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Finger v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01833
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Carpenter v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Allen Carpenter
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Tamer Mahmoud v. Monifa McKnight
as 23-1890
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMER MAHMOUD, ENAS BARAKAT, JEFF ROMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONIFA B. MCKNIGHT, SHEBRA L. EVANS, LYNNE HARRIS and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOUGLAS LAYCOCK, Professor, HELEN M. ALVARE, Professor, THOMAS C. BERG, Professor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00345
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mahmoud et al v. McKnight et al
as 8:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Tamer Mahmoud, Enas Barakat, Jeff Roman and others
Defendant:
Monifa B. McKnight, Shebra Evans, Lynne Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rivera et al v. Guzman et al
as 4:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Hugo Rivera and ENA SANZ DE RIVERA
Defendant:
PABLO GUZMAN, BOSURI LLC, GUSORI LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ena Mejia v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1221
Petitioner:
ENA ISABEL MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Chen v. Samantha et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Ena Chen
Defendant:
Samantha, Vivian, Ana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
