Cases 21 - 30 of 53
GLADWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29503
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY GLADWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. Tallant et al
as 4:2019cv04102
Defendant:
Brain Sheriff McJunkins, Chief Deputy John Eric Gladwell, Jana Tallant and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Shannon Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Simmons v. Charles Williams
as 19-6989
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE CHAMBERS, a/k/a Michelle Chamber, STEPHANIE MARSHALL, BELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL SIMMONS
Rucker v. Stirling et al
as 1:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Williams et al
as 0:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Michelle Chambers, Tim E. Rogers, Bryan P. Stirlings and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feaster v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Victoria Norman, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jason D Feaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Williams et al
as 5:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Jennifer Franklin, Kelly, Michelle Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv03569
Defendant:
Jennifer Franklin, Willie F. Smith, Michelle Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Stirling et al
as 2:2018cv03245
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Officer John Doe 2, A Gladwell and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryan v. Williams et al
as 1:2018cv02892
Defendant:
A. Gladwell, C. Jones, Stanley Terry and others
Plaintiff:
Laquan D. Bryan and Laquan Bryan
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Keith Rucker and Nathaniel Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
