Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Dale v. Harvey et al
as 2:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Duane Allen Dale
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Harvey and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raabe v. Harvey et al
as 2:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Nancy A. Raabe
Defendant:
Officer Harvey and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harvey v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Richard Harvey
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cooley v. Nunley et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Walter Andrew Cooley
Respondent:
William Nunley and Harvey Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States of America v. Two (2) Westinghouse 600 Amp 3 Pole Breakers et al
as 5:2021cv00297
Defendant:
Eaton 1200 Amp NGS-50K 2 Pole Breakers, Eaton 300 Amp 3 Pole Breaker, Westinghouse Series C 40 Amp 3 Pole Breaker and others
Interested Party:
Jerry Harvey
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
York v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00739
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
James Harvey York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Means v. Peterson et al
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
D. Harvey, The City of South Charleston and E. M. Peterson
Plaintiff:
William Allen Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
