Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Holmes v. Hook et al
as 2:2021cv02043
Plaintiff:
Darrell Holmes
Defendant:
Kevin Hook, Melton Truck Lines Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooks v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00554
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Robert Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez et al v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv03699
Plaintiff:
Fabian Hernandez , Joseph Artiaga , David J Daniels and others
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Amos Smith, Robert Winfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hooke et al v. Salazar et al
as 2:2012cv01634
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar and United States Department of the Interior
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hooke and Carol Hooke
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Dukepoo v. Prewitt et al
as 2:2010cv01216
Defendant:
Unknown Prewitt, Unknown Redd, Unknown Hooke and others
Plaintiff:
Monty V Dukepoo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooks v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Hooks
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa LLC, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and UDL Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hooks v. McWilliams et al
as 2:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hooks
Defendant:
McWilliams, Marie, Judy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad et al v. Hawthorne et al
as 2:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad, AIM, Christine Onasis and others
Defendant:
Kirk Hawthorne, Martin King, III, Dexter King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Shaw
Defendant:
Meg Allen, George H Bush, Barbarh Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv00009
Defendant:
Unknown Zaborsky, Unknown Rice, Unknown Fansler and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
