Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. State Of Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Dalton Grant Miller
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Kevin W. Windham, John Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 9:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
David Allen Jones
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Office of the Orlearns Parish District Attorney
as 3:2015cv00347
Defendant:
Office of the Orlearns Parish District Attorney
Plaintiff:
John Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PUCKETT v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2011cv00602
Defendant:
CITY OF FRANKLIN, TROY DEHART, LANCE HAMNER and others
As A Person:
COUNTY OF JOHNSON MUNICIPALITY
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. PUCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
