Cases 41 - 50 of 23,680
Rupp, et al. v. Bonta
as 24-2583
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RUPP, STEVEN DEMBER, CHERYL JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Lorraine Johnson v. Michael Rene Angel et al
as 5:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
Lorraine Johnson and Michael Rene Angel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Thomas Johnson
Respondent:
James Hill and R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #218584 v. Otter et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J Williams
Defendant:
N Otter, Unknown Valasco, Unknown Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Douglas et al v. Grand Management Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Harry Douglas and Karrie Holman
Defendant:
Grand Management Services, Inc., Barbara Johnson-Martin and Lucius Calvin Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Drew v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08073
Plaintiff:
Corey Drew
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Dennis M McGrane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commonwealth Hospitality LLC
as 24-2454
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH HOSPITALITY LLC
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
