Cases 31 - 40 of 1,463
Jones Digital LLC v. Arkansas County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jones Digital LLC
Defendant:
Arkansas County, Arkansas, Thomas Best, Johnny Cheek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jones v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Arlen Ray Jones
Defendant:
Jail Administrator John or Jane Doe, Turn Key Medical, Captain Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Mississippi Limestone Corporation
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi Limestone Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jones v. Love et al
as 4:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Jones
Defendant:
Janie Love, Karen Angerman, Crystal Stripling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denson v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Denson
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackleford v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Donald Shackleford
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Cedric Armond Mitchell
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00992
Plaintiff:
Robert Howard
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tackett v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Charles Tackett
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockwood v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Stephen W Lockwood
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
