Cases 11 - 20 of 9,606
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Broussard et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant:
Jeremy Broussard, Patricia Ryan Cenac Estate, Shane Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 24-40337
Petitioner:
Nicholas Nahrue Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Stanfield v. Jones et al
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stanfield and Randy Jones
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Brian Collier and Unknown Loosier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Treeline Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thaggard
Defendant:
Treeline Services, LLC, Anthony Jones, Michael Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Jones v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
Landon R. Jones
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Walker v. Travis County, Texas
as 1:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
Travis County, Texas, Amber Jones, Vivian Pan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Heuer
as 24-50348
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Defendant:
Lon Heuer, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office, Charles Keith Hawkes, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office, Quentin Price, with the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
