Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Burton et al v. Bluefield Realty Group, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv01800
Plaintiff: Shauntell Burton, Benny D. Cheatham, Robert Douglass and others
Defendant: Bluefield Realty Group, LLC, Allen Tate Real Estate, LLC, McClendon Realty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Joyner v. Shinn, et al.
as 24-995
Petitioner: MARK A. JOYNER
Respondent: DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA and RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
United States of America v. Adekoya
as 24-282
Defendant: DAVID DANIYAN, JERJUAN JOYNER, GAYSHA KENNEDY and others
Defendant / Appellant: OLUWASEUN ADEKOYA and John Calling
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Deangelo Joyner
as 24-4036
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: DEANGELO MAURICE JOYNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00847
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JOYNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
as NJ/3:23-CV-20558
Plaintiff: JOYNER and PAMELA JOYNER
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv18362
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KIRBY v. JOYNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00754
Plaintiff: ROBERT KIRBY, III
Defendant: RICHARD JOYNER and STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Terrell Joyner
as 23-245
Petitioner: In re: TERRELL ROSHAD JOYNER
Ewing v. 360 Tax Strategy Corp et al
as 3:2023cv01427
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: 360 Tax Strategy Corp and Vonnette Joyner
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?