Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Loza v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 0:2024cv01492
Petitioner:
Javier Gonzalez Loza
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ettienne-Modeste Jr., Dexter v. Pallacios et al
as 1:2024cv21048
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne-Modeste Jr.
Defendant:
Pallacios, John Doe, J. Loza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Friddle v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Danny Friddle
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Shawn Wead, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Roberson v. CDCR et al
as 1:2022cv00833
Plaintiff:
Morris Roberson
Defendant:
CDCR, D. Chavez, C. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Loza v. Vierra et al
as 2:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Enrique De Loza
Defendant:
Brenda M. Vierra and Richard Mauro
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gulbronson v. Randolph et al
as 1:2021cv01262
Plaintiff:
Eric Conrad Gulbronson
Defendant:
A. Randolph, J. Navarro, Kyle Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Loza v. United States
as 1:2021cv03607
Plaintiff:
Mr. Javier Gonzalez-Loza
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
(PC) Jaramillo v. Burnes et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Alfonso Garcia, M. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Rudie Anthony Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
