Cases 1 - 10 of 24,140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01258
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Manougian v. Calixte et al
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ara Manougian
Defendant:
Hans M. Calixte and Lolo Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. K. Richardson
as 24-6397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
K. RICHARDSON, (Lieutenant) at Sussex Complex, J. M. BRANCH, (Unit Manager/Chief of Housing and Programming) at Sussex Complex, BETH CABELL, (Head Warden) at Sussex Complex and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zinner v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Edward M. Zinner
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
EVANS v. THROCKMORTON et al
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT EVANS
Defendant:
LARRY MICHAEL THROCKMORTON and H&M LOGGING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
