Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Cestaro v. Rodriguez
as 24-973
Plaintiff:
R. MICHAEL CESTARO
Defendant:
CLARISSA M. RODRIGUEZ, Chair, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in her individual and official capacity, DAVID WERTHEIM, Former Acting Executive director and Former General Counsel, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in his individual and official capacity, HEATHER MACMASTER, Acting General Counsel, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in her individual and Official Capacity and others
Brookins v. Acosta, et al.
as 24-1801
Plaintiff:
BARRY L. BROOKINS
Defendant:
F. ACOSTA, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, R. SOTO, Correctional Officer at SATF-Corcoran, A. SHAW, Appeals Coordinator at SATF-Corcoran and others
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez Thomas v. US
as 23-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVELYN M. RODRIGUEZ THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
EVELYN M. RODRIGUEZ THOMAS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Angel Rodriguez-Gomez v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2920
Petitioner:
ANGEL M. RODRIGUEZ-GOMEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Rodriguez-Garcia
as 21-1723
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS M. RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA
Rodriguez-Torres v. US
as 21-1593
Petitioner / Appellant:
VICTOR M. RODRIGUEZ-TORRES
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
