Cases 1 - 10 of 39
William Fly v. United States, et al
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly, also known as Tony Fly, also known as Toni Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Coy v. Morton et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Adam Eugene Coy
Defendant:
Jessica Morton, Nathaniel Chapman, Krystal Beyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morton v. Staley et al
as 4:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jason Morton
Defendant:
John Staley, W Shipp, Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lemont Maurice Rogers
Defendant:
Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. and Bismarck N.D. Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmer v. Zahnd et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Webber Douglas Gilmer
Defendant:
Eric G. Zahnd, Guy Kirtley and Matthew Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damon Morton v. United States
as 22-3397
Petitioner / Appellant:
Damon Morton
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Morton v. USA
as 4:2022cv00724
Petitioner:
Damon Morton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kinder v. Clark et al
as 5:2022cv06006
Plaintiff:
Adrian Douglas Lee Kinder
Defendant:
Cook Unknown Clark, Cook Unknown Morton, Cook Unknown Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinder v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv01502
Plaintiff:
Adrian Douglas Lee Kinder
Defendant:
Cook Unknown Clark, Cook Unknown Morton, Cook Unknown Durbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Page et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Creasey, William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
