Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Chacon Ovalle v. Garland
as 24-9530
Petitioner:
LIDIA GUISE CHACON OVALLE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Oval Capital Limited Liability Company et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate/Policy No. 798200, Authority Ref NO B174010045SS22
as 1:2024cv02661
Plaintiff:
OVAL CAPITAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (d/b/a OVAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT) and TIFERET VENTURES, LLC
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE/POLICY NO. 798200, AUTHORITY REF NO B174010045SS22
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Guzman Ovalle et al v. A.B.C. Trade, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00864
Defendant:
A.B.C. Trade, LLC also known as ABC Trade, LLC doing business as Hot Pot Kitchen, ABC Trade, LLC and Baolan Liang
Plaintiff:
Edin Guzman Ovalle and Jose Ernesto Sanchez Guevara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Ovalle
as 24-50023
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Ovalle
Santos Ovalle v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2023cv02489
Plaintiff:
Santos Ovalle
Defendant:
County of Orange, a public entity, Orange County Sheriff Department and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Ovalle-Martinez
as 23-20577
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Martin Ovalle-Martinez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
OVALLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19415
Plaintiff:
WELLINGTON OVALLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
