Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Guerrero et al v. Adams County Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Belynn Guerrero, Terry Martin, Belynn (I) Guerrero and others
Defendant:
Adams County Colorado, Gene Claps, Adams County Board of County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Munoz-Pasillas v. Garland
as 23-3923
Petitioner:
ALBERTO MUNOZ-PASILLAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jimenez-Pasillas v. Garland
as 23-1171
Petitioner:
SERGIO JIMENEZ-PASILLAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edgar Pasilla Gutierrez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Edgar Pasilla Gutierrez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Esco, et al v. Tena, et al
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
John D. Esco, Valery Esco and Valerey Esco
Defendant:
Pedro Firmin Tena, National Transportation Insurance Company - Risk Retention Group, LLC, Omar Pasillas and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Edgar Pasilla Gutierrez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02157
Plaintiff:
Edgar Pasilla Gutierrez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Pasillas v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Hector Pasillas
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
