Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Terry Pyles v. Ryan Strebing, et al
as 24-1797
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. PYLES
Defendant:
RYAN STREBING and ALEX FRESHOUR
Tuggle v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tuggle
Defendant:
Cord Williams, Christian L. Pyles, E Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gharavi et al v. Flosports, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01969
Plaintiff:
Nima Gharavi and Right Call Officials, Inc.
Defendant:
Flosports, Inc., Christian Pyles, Jessica Presley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Pyles v. Freshour et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Petitioner:
Terry L Pyles
Respondent:
Alex Freshour, Ryan Sterbing and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Terry Pyles v. Jacob Daily
as 23-2302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY L. PYLES
Defendant / Appellee:
JACOB DAILY, Officer
Pyles v. Madison County Court et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Pyles
Defendant:
Madison County Court, Donna Polinske, Martin Mengarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Terry Pyles
Defendant:
Stephen Brown, Ryan Sterebing and Alex Freshour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbara Tully, et al v. Paul Okeson, et al
as 22-2835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA TULLY, KATHARINE BLACK, MARC BLACK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL OKESON, SUZANNAH WILSON OVERHOLT, LITANY PYLE, in their official capacity as members of the Indiana Election Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Mims et al v. MacPyles Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Charles Mims and Madria Mims
Defendant:
MacPyles Corporation and Robert Pyles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
