Cases 1 - 10 of 66
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PYLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE PYLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
NUNEZ v. POBORSKY et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT POBORSKY, LIEUTENANT E. LEVANDNUK, CORRECTIONS OFFICER B. REESEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Medina v. Reich et al
as 5:2022cv03300
Plaintiff:
Errol Medina
Defendant:
Jeffrey Reich, Rebecca Chevraunt, George Graybill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv03077
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PYLE v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2022cv01715
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP, DOMINIC J VENUTI, FRED C RHODES, JR and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PYLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv02932
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER PYLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PYLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021cv02951
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER PYLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dixon v. McDanial et al
as 1:2021cv00935
Amicus Curiae:
Hodge Prison Administration Supervisor
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E. Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Karen Pyle, Ms. Auderey A. England, Dr. Saraha Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
