Cases 1 - 10 of 3,440
Sheppard v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sheppard and Antonio Decarlo Sheppard, Jr
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Matushak, Jody Perttu, CO Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Ramirez
as 24-10378
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
FNU Ramirez, Correctional Officer, Kristine Carouth, Nurse (LVN) and Tarrant County Corrections Center Jail
Rando Saavedra-Ramirez v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1738
Plaintiff:
RANDO SAAVEDRA-RAMIREZ
Defendant:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN LORETTO FCI
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
