Cases 21 - 30 of 135
Russell v. Randolph et al
as 2:2021cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ryon Russell
Defendant:
Sergeant Randolph, Correctional Officer Williams, Correctional Officer Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Lister et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Randolph Clay Cooper
Defendant:
Shawn Lucas Lister, Aaron Glass, Zach Kuiken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cudnohufsky et al v. Apple Inc
as 5:2021cv00975
Plaintiff:
Lorrie Cudnohufsky, Darina Wynette Beasley, Marina Bromley and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Robinson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lewis Edwards
Defendant:
Christian Robinson, Brittany Marshall and Clevon Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Aemerge LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00747
Defendant:
Randolph L. Seger Revocable Trust, AFM Capital LLC, Bindley Capital Investors LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Landon Cabell Garland Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Craig v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00140
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randolph Craig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, United States District Court, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Captain Smiley, Captain Carter, LaCharla Kirksey and others
Plaintiff:
LaMichael LaCorey Stone and JaMichael LaCorey Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Randolph County, Alabama et al
as 3:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Joyce Adams, Randy Moore, Angela Price and others
Plaintiff:
Dale McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
