Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Dean Manes v. City of Santa Ana, et al
as 23-55543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEAN MANES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA ANA, in official capacity, Official capacity Erroneously Sued As Santa Ana Jail, NAPHCARE, INC., Erroneously Sued As Naphcare, PEREZ, Supervisor Officer;individual capacity and others
Reynosa v. Cromwell
as 2:2022cv01556
Petitioner:
Jose H Reynosa
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daryl Harmon v. E. Reynosa et al
as 5:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Daryl Harmon
Defendant:
E. Reynosa, J. Vaca, J Curiel Magana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Corcoran State Prison et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Defendant:
R. Reynosa, D. Childdress, Aguirre and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. MEND Correctional Care
as 4:2020cv04274
Plaintiff:
Juwan Crawford, Eddie Rigsby, Michael Stromer and others
Defendant:
MEND Correctional Care
Interested Party:
Jerowimo Price, Jonathan Robinson, Adell L Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Clay v. Eldon Monk, et al
as 17-20306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS H. CLAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT ELDON L. MONK, DIRECTOR EARNESTINE B. JULYE, N.C. MARCO HENKERMEYER and others
Clay v. Monk et al
as 4:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clay
Defendant:
Eldon L Monk, Earnestine B Julye, Marco Henkermeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novodvorschi v. Paquel et al
as 5:2015cv00595
Defendant:
FNU Abels, FNU Arredondo, FNU Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Novodvorschi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Clifton v. D. Davis et al
as 2:2013cv09189
Defendant:
S. Busby, S. Busby, D. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
William Clifton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
