Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Sharpe v. United States Naval Academy
as 1:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
CDR John F. Sharpe
Defendant:
United States Naval Academy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Sharpe v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Sharpe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Sharpe v. State et al
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gordon A. Sharpe
Defendant:
State, Berkeley County Magistrate Court, WV Division of Motor Vehicle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. The United States of America et al
as 0:2022cv03445
Defendant:
Alpha Assembly Solutions, Inc., Ashland Inc., INEOS US Chemicals Company and others
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 Hazardous Substances Releases, Liability - Definition
US v. Kijuan Sharp
as 22-4383
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KIJUAN HAASSAN SHARP
Burlington Drug Company, Inc. et al v. Merck & Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc., J M Smith Corporation doing business as Smith Drug Company and others
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Schering-Plough Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Giant Eagle, Inc.
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering-Plough Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
US v. Shahid Muslim
as 21-7633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAHID HASSAN MUSLIM, a/k/a Sharp, a/k/a Sean Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
