Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Sharpe v. State et al
as 3:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gordon A. Sharpe
Defendant:
State, Berkeley County Magistrate Court, WV Division of Motor Vehicle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Sharp v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Robert Carl Sharp
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beall et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Mitchell Beall, Brandon Bailey, Joseph R. Bragg and others
Counter Defendant:
John Borzik, Lieutenant Charles D. Campbell, Michael Close and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Inc. and Mylan API US LLC
Plaintiff:
Organon USA Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sharp v. Hudgins
as 5:2019cv00314
Respondent:
K. Hudgins
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sharp v. Hudgins
as 5:2019cv00232
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sharp v. Warden
as 5:2019cv00204
Respondent:
Warden - FCI Gilmer
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00101
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.
Plaintiff:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Aikens et al v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00143
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. and Merck & Co. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donna Aikens and Willard Aikens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
