Cases 41 - 50 of 837
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Rucker et al v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Tikeila Rucker, Rachael Spriggs, Damon Curry-Morris and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Carolyn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sherman v. Superior Electric
as 1:2023cv01108
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sherman
Defendant:
Superior Electric
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GLOVER v. OUTLAW et al
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. GLOVER
Defendant:
DANIEL OUTLAW, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE MOFFA NICHOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherman v. DeJoy
as 3:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
Janae Sherman
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, Respondent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
