Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
Robinson v. Airbnb, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Craig Robinson
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc., Airbnb Payments, Inc. and Donnet Roxanne Swaby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McKenzie v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Leonard Antowyne McKenzie, III
Defendant:
Indiana State of, St Joseph County, Jenny Pitts Manier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swaby v. Garland
as 23-60628
Petitioner:
Tafari Jamel Swaby
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SWABY-SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv19469
Plaintiff:
JULIE G SWABY-SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tafari Swaby v. U.S. Attorney GeneralIn re: Tafari Swaby v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-12040
Petitioner:
In re: TAFARI JAMEL SWABY
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant:
DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant:
Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae:
United States Chamber of Commerce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
