Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rivera-Quiles v. Municipality of Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv01068
Plaintiff:
Hector Luis Rivera-Quiles
Defendant:
Municipality of Carolina, HON. Jose Aponte-Dalmau, Wife Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stack v. Kuligowski et al
as 1:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Keith Fortier, Claudette Kuligowski, Jessica Migneault and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Z Stack and Kurt Z Stack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Castro-De Leon v. Mastec Utility Sevices
as 3:2019cv02038
Plaintiff:
Elias J Castro-De Leon
Defendant:
Mastec Utility Sevices, Mastec, Y Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Velez-Acevedo et al v. Centro de Cancer de La Universidad de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2019cv01560
Plaintiff:
Hector Aponte-Benejan, Conjugal Partnership Aponte-Velez and Grendaliz Velez-Acevedo
Defendant:
Mary Pou de Clavell, Centro de Cancer de La Universidad de Puerto Rico, Luis A. Clavell-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
SMITH v. ATHENAHEALTH INC
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
ATHENAHEALTH INC, JOHN C NIVISON and GEORGE Z SINGAL
Plaintiff:
CHARMANE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
