Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Gibbs v. Wall
as 1:2018cv00430
Plaintiff:
Solomon Jermain Gibbs
Defendant:
A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eplion v. Farmer et al
as 3:2018cv00978
Plaintiff:
Randall Eplion
Defendant:
A.T. Farmer, Western Regional Jail and Elbert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Crone et al
as 1:2018cv00236
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Crone, Lieutenant Baker, Correctional Officer LeVasseur and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Duffy et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
Duffy, Mathew Kettle and A.T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartzmiller et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Dean A. Schwartzmiller and Christopher Dean Harmon, JR.
Defendant:
K. Rodriguez, John Larson, NBC News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Roy v. A.T. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Steven Roy
Defendant:
A.T. Wall , Matthew Kettle , Walter Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGinnis v. Ramos
as 3:2015cv02812
Plaintiff:
Anthony McGinnis
Defendant:
A.T. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dantzler v. State of RI, et al
as 15-2472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, ADULT CORRECTIONAL and STATE OF RI
Turner v. Wall, et al
as 15-1693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYMAN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, RI, D.O.C. Director, JOSEPH DINITTO, RI, D.O.C Associate Director for Classification and JAMES WEEDEN
Defendant:
DAVID MCCAULEY, RI, D.O.C. Assistant Director
Turner v. Wall, et al
as 15-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYMAN TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, RI, D.O.C. Director, DAVID MCCAULEY, RI, D.O.C. Assistant Director, JOSEPH DINITTO, RI, D.O.C Associate Director for Classification and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
