Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01353
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Akintola v. United States of America
as 25-2839
Petitioner:
OLUWATOMIWA AKINTOLA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Felix (Wade)
as 25-1447
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ABUCHI SHEDRACH FELIX, OLUWATOMIWA AKINTOLA, GREGORY OCHIAGHA and others
VISNISKI v. AKINTOLA et al
as 5:2025cv00233
Plaintiff:
DARION MARIAH VISNISKI
Defendant:
AKINDEJI TOLU AKINTOLA and ROGERS CARTAGE CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Visniski v. Akintola et al
as 3:2025cv00108
Plaintiff:
Darion Mariah Visniski
Defendant:
Akindeji Tolu Akintola and Rogers Cartage Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Akintola Akinyemi v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv02024
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Akintola Akinyemi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AKINMADEYEMI v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv07003
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Petitioner:
AKINTOLA AKINMADEYEMI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Kelly v. Bandaru et al
as 2:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Bandaru, Akintola, Gina Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kelly v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv02581
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Newsom, Warden, Akintola Omaniyi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akintola v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv03839
Plaintiff:
Oluwatomiwa Akintola
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
