Cases 1 - 10 of 11
HAYES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37338
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Merck & Co. Inc. d/b/a Merck,
as 2:2019cv03741
Defendant:
Merck & Co. Inc. d/b/a Merck,
Plaintiff:
Albert Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albert Hayes v. M. Voong, et al
as 17-16653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. VOONG, Acting Chief Inmate Appeal Officer, J. P. CORRAL, Appeal Coordinator and J. ZAMORA, Appeal Coordinator
Hayes v. Kernan et al
as 1:2016cv01235
Plaintiff:
Albert Hayes
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, M. Voong, J. P. Corral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03471
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brigman, Moses Green, Albert Hayes and others
Defendant:
Police Officer Brown, City of New York, Police Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv07740
Plaintiff:
Patricia Howard and Albert Hayes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albert Hayes v. J. Tilton
as 11-56160
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT HAYES
Respondent - Appellee:
J. E. TILTON
Albert Hayes v. W. Rosser, et al
as 09-56495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
W. ROSSER, Individual, employed as a correctional officer, R. NIPPER, individual, and official capacity and B. WIMBISH, individual, employed as a correctional officer
Defendant:
SULLIVAN, individual and official capacity (first name unknown)
Albert Hayes v. W. Rosser, et al
as 08-56951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
W. ROSSER, individual, Employed as a Correctional Officer, R. NIPPER, individual, official capacity and B. WIMBISH, individual, Employed as a Correctional Officer
Defendant:
SULLIVAN, individual (first name unknown) official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
