Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Albert Perez v. John Wetzel, et al
as 16-3848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, SUPERINTENDENT OD SCI GRATERFORD PRISON, GEORGE ONDREJKA, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SECURITY AT GRATERFORD and others
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2014cv06494
Petitioner:
ALBERT PEREZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05619
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , MIKE WENEROWICZ , GEORGE ONDREJKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepin v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2013cv07908
Plaintiff:
Ursula Pepin
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The , Petain Navez , Jose Lomeli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Alberto Aler
as 12-15707
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO ALERS, a.k.a. Albert Escobar, a.k.a. Albert Perez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Fields et al v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Erick Fields and Ursula Pepin
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Petain Navez, Jose Lomeli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AARON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76872
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PEREZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv60028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
